Skip to main content
The Food Policy
Institute

Main navigation

  • About us
  • News
  • Contact
The Food Policy
Institute

Wales: Subsidies are "far short of what farmers warned is required"

  • Tweet
Monday, 20 July, 2026
  • Articles
brecons

The Welsh Government’s announcement of a £340 million annual budget for the Sustainable Farming Scheme (SFS) provides one thing that farmers have repeatedly asked for: certainty. A guaranteed, ring-fenced budget running until 2030 allows family farms to plan ahead with greater confidence after years of annual funding decisions. Both the Farmers’ Union of Wales and NFU Cymru welcomed the move, noting that multi-year settlements are far better suited to the long-term nature of farming businesses.

However, certainty is only valuable if the funding is sufficient. The reality is that the £340 million annual allocation is broadly the same level of support Welsh farming has received since 2012. Over that period, inflation has dramatically increased the cost of fuel, fertiliser, feed, machinery, labour and borrowing. In real terms, many farmers will argue this amounts to a significant reduction in support, despite the headline figure remaining unchanged.

That concern is reflected across the industry. Farming organisations have consistently argued that closer to £500 million per year is now required simply to maintain the sector’s viability in the face of rising costs. Even those welcoming the announcement, including NFU Cymru and the Farmers’ Union of Wales, made clear they would still like to see a larger settlement in future.

The challenge for ministers is that Welsh family farms are being asked to do more than ever before. They are expected to produce high-quality food, enhance biodiversity, improve water quality, reduce carbon emissions and support rural communities, all while operating within increasingly tight financial margins. Environmental improvements require investment, but so too does maintaining productive, profitable farm businesses.

This is why Welsh Conservative Shadow Farming Minister Andrew RT Davies described the settlement as falling “far short of what farmers warned is required”, arguing that real-terms cuts in support risk damaging one of Wales’ most important industries. That criticism deserves serious consideration. A funding settlement that stands still while costs continue to rise inevitably means farmers are expected to deliver more with less.

Welsh family farms have consistently demonstrated their willingness to adapt and embrace sustainable practices. What they need in return is not only policy stability but a funding settlement that reflects today’s economic realities. Without that, the long-term resilience of Welsh agriculture, and the rural communities it sustains, will remain under unnecessary pressure.

You may also be interested in

andy b

Why Burnham should prioritise food policy

Saturday, 18 July, 2026
Andy Burnham has long argued that food policy is not simply a question of agriculture or welfare, but of health, economic resilience and opportunity. If he is serious about building a fairer and more prosperous Britain, food policy should become one of the defining missions of his government.

Show only

  • Articles

Food Policy Institute

Footer

  • About RSS
  • Accessibility
  • Cookies
  • Privacy
  • About us
The Food Policy Institute is an independent think tank based in London.
Copyright 2026 The Food Policy Institute. All rights reserved.
Powered by Bluetree